Dr. Pippie Hugues

Policy Analyst in Governance and Democracy at the Nkafu Policy Institute

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i5n03

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Contrary to the widespread claims of democratic regression in sub-Saharan Africa, our research on democratic processes reveals a different reality. We have found that the region's democratic journey over the past two decades has largely remained stagnant, with no significant advancements or setbacks in terms of political and civil liberties since the initial transitions in the early 1990s. However, this apparent lack of progress in African democratization masks the active efforts of incumbent leaders to undermine key actors, such as civil society, and structural conditions, such as urbanization, that could potentially lead to greater liberalization. To explain the uneven progress in democratization, despite increased political participation across the region, we argue that Africa's incumbent leaders have employed two often overlooked processes: legal institutions and international relationships. Firstly, these leaders have utilized the law and courts to restrict the ability of domestic actors to mobilize against them. By strategically using the law to consolidate their power and strengthen executive authority, they have undermined other institutional checks and balances. Secondly, incumbent leaders have effectively manipulated their international relationships to counteract the democratizing influence of external actors, including foreign donors and transnational civil society. This manipulation includes employing claims of sovereignty to resist external intervention in domestic politics.

REFERENCES

1) Alizada, N., Cole, R., Gastaldi, L., Grahn, S., Hellmeier, S., Kolvani, P., Lachapelle, J., Lührmann, A., Maerz, S., Pillai, S. and Lindberg, S. (2021). Autocratization turns viral. Democracy report 2021. University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute.

2) Anderson, D. (2019). Comparative democratization and democratic backsliding: The case for a historical-institutional approach. Comparative Politics, 51(4), 645–663.

3) Arriola, Leonardo R., Lise Rakner, and Nicolas van de Walle, 'Democratic Backsliding in Africa? Autocratization, Resilience, and Contention', in Leonardo R. Arriola, Lise Rakner, and Nicolas van de Walle (eds), Democratic Backsliding in Africa? Autocratization, Resilience, and Contention (Oxford, 2022; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Jan. 2023), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192867322.003.0001, accessed 29 Apr. 2024.

4) Bleck, J. and N. van de Walle. 2019. Electoral Politics in Africa since 1990: Continuity and Change. Cambridge University Press.

5) Diamond, L. (2008). The democratic rollback: The resurgence of the predatory state. Foreign Affairs, 87(2), 36–48. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20032579

6) Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. UK: Penguin Random House. https://www.eui.eu/Documents/DepartmentsCentres/SPS/ResearchAndTeaching/How-Democracies-Die.pdf

7) Norris P. “What Drives Democracy”? In Driving Democracy, Do Power-sharing Institution work? Cambridge University Press; 2008: 3-36

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 05 MAY 2024